Youth Control Act (Education)
There has been a decline in education standards over the past thirty years. One theory for this is the increase of the incidence of attention deficit disorder (ADD) among the youth population. A far more feasible (we are the Sensible Party after all) theory is that children are suffering from a lack of focus rather than a medical condition.
Rather than adding Ritalin to all school meals (with all of the budgetary implications), a better approach would be to persuade pupils to pay more attention at school by natural organic methods. Historically this is achieved by the threat of punishment; there is a major flaw in this strategy.
Disruptive children do not want to go to school. In order to persuade these children to behave, the educational establishments threaten greater punishments, ending in exclusion. To reiterate this, the children do not wish to attend, and if they are disruptive, the system allows them to do just that. Under the Sensible Party common sense guidlines, this seems wrong. Surely this is a reward and not a punishment?
Mother Nature has given all species a natural learning capability. In nature, when learning the difference between right and wrong, pain plays a huge part. In the wild, animals stay well clear of hornets, lions, and poisonous plants, all without biology lessons. Just imagine what we could achieve if we combined this invaluable stimulus with our education systems.
It is proposed to remove the reward of not having to attend school. This will be replaced with the controlled application of neuro-stimulo-control (NSC), using a variety of applicators. These applicators will be made of various materials such as bamboo or wood, and can be used manually. In the case of establishments where large amounts of NSC are being dispensed, automatic electrical applicators will be made available to reduce the likelihood of RSI.
It is the belief of the Sensible Party that, by implementing this Act, the youth of our time would focus more at school, which would result in a better qualified society of tomorrow.
A sensible policy for a sensible Britain.
Rather than adding Ritalin to all school meals (with all of the budgetary implications), a better approach would be to persuade pupils to pay more attention at school by natural organic methods. Historically this is achieved by the threat of punishment; there is a major flaw in this strategy.
Disruptive children do not want to go to school. In order to persuade these children to behave, the educational establishments threaten greater punishments, ending in exclusion. To reiterate this, the children do not wish to attend, and if they are disruptive, the system allows them to do just that. Under the Sensible Party common sense guidlines, this seems wrong. Surely this is a reward and not a punishment?
Mother Nature has given all species a natural learning capability. In nature, when learning the difference between right and wrong, pain plays a huge part. In the wild, animals stay well clear of hornets, lions, and poisonous plants, all without biology lessons. Just imagine what we could achieve if we combined this invaluable stimulus with our education systems.
It is proposed to remove the reward of not having to attend school. This will be replaced with the controlled application of neuro-stimulo-control (NSC), using a variety of applicators. These applicators will be made of various materials such as bamboo or wood, and can be used manually. In the case of establishments where large amounts of NSC are being dispensed, automatic electrical applicators will be made available to reduce the likelihood of RSI.
It is the belief of the Sensible Party that, by implementing this Act, the youth of our time would focus more at school, which would result in a better qualified society of tomorrow.
A sensible policy for a sensible Britain.
# posted by The Sensible Party @ 15:59 
